USPTO serial 74488270
RED SPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED SPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Universal Foods & Merchandise Co.
Toronto, Ontario M6J 2Y7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Vernon
ROBERT E VERNON GUARDIAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SERVICES2103 CONSTANCE DROAKVILLE, ON L6J 5V1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | carbonated beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |