USPTO serial 74489113
ORBI-TEL CALLNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHULMAN, LORI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORBI-TEL CALLNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy K. Sterns
RANDY K STERNS BUSH ROSS GARDNER WARREN & RUDY, PATELTRONICS, INC2150 WHITFIELD INDUSTRIAL WAYSARASOTA, FL 34243-4046Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software program that is designed to collect and process data that is generated each time a call is placed by a user of a host telephone system; the software program then analyzes the data to determine if the call meets user-defined criteria that may indicate telephone fraud or abuse of the telephone system | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1996 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |