USPTO serial 74503918
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
City of Industry, CA
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
Pico Rivera, CA
Pico Rivera, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cindy L. Caditz
Cindy L. Caditz DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300Seattle, WA 98104-1610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | potato-based snack foods, namely, potato chips, potato puffs, potato sticks and potato fries; fried snacks, namely, pork rinds, [ lima beans, and garbanzo beans; dried shrimp; beef jerky; ] processed nutmeats; and snack mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts, raisins and/or processed fruit | ACTIVE | May 31, 1978 |
| 030 | [ cookies; ] candies excluding mints and peppermints; popped popcorn; puffed corn snacks; corn chips; wheat based snack chips; cheese puffed corn, rice, potato, wheat and various combination-grain snacks; seasoned puffed corn, rice, potato, wheat and various combination-grain snacks; unseasoned puffed corn, rice, potato, wheat and various combination-grain snacks; puffed rice snacks; and snack mixes consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, chips and other puffed snacks | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2023 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 20, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 20, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2007 | 815I | INITIAL REVIEW ACTION MAILED - SECT 8 AND 15 | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |