USPTO serial 74505190
ATTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY PANITCH SCHWARZ JACOBS & NADEL, PC1601 MARKET ST 36TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automatic sprinklers for fire protection | ABANDONED | Oct 27, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |