USPTO serial 74506026
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
London W1P 0AB, GB
London W1P 0AB, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory S. Shatan
GREGORY S SHATAN BOX TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | ornamental novelty buttons; belt buckles | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 16, 1997 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |