USPTO serial 74506272
TV CITY RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TV CITY RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Salem, NY
North Salem, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Rodner
STEPHEN B RODNER PRYOR, CASHMAN, SHERMAN & FLYNN410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4441UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |