USPTO serial 74509830
RAND CAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAND CAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Shlesinger
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | engines not for land vehicles; rotary pumps; rotary compressors for air conditioners and refrigerators; rotary air compressors for providing compressed air to shops and factories for pneumatic tools, filling compressed air cylinders and similar applications; rotary compressors for natural gas and methane used to compress these gases for filling tanks in vehicles or storage tanks and for transporting the gases through pipelines; rotary compressors for ethylene used in the plastic industry; expanders, and electrical generators not for land vehicles, and parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | motors and engines for vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REGI U.S., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sky Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by REGI U.S., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named RAND CAM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 30, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |