Drawing for HOMEBASE

USPTO serial 74518057

HOMEBASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMEBASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin R. Greenstein

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET STSIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs for use in storing and managing household, family and/or personal informationACTIVEMar 29, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2002ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT
Mar 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 10, 2000REINREINSTATED
Feb 8, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 7, 1999SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 31, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 8, 1998EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 21, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Apr 3, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 25, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 2, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 1, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 28, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 2, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 19, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 30, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 2, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 26, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 28, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 26, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 11, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance