USPTO serial 74518057
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Scotts Valley, CA
Scotts Valley, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET STSIXTEENTH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use in storing and managing household, family and/or personal information | ACTIVE | Mar 29, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2002 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 9, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |