USPTO serial 74518203
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Dalton
ROGER S BOROVOY FISH & RICHARDSON2200 SAND HILL RD STE 200MENLO PARK, CA 94025UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and computer peripheral devices, namely one-way and two-way wireless and wireline communications devices for sending, receiving, and processing information from computer data, electronic mail, facsimile transmissions, voice messages, and telephone transmissions | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1995 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 4, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |