USPTO serial 74519089
VEGAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 1995
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VEGAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LAS VEGAS, NV
LAS VEGAS, NV
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. McCue
Michael J. McCue Lewis and Roca LLP3993 Howard Hughes ParkwaySte. 600Las Vegas, NV 89169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | magazines about entertainment and related information in the city of Las Vegas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lambert, Douglas
- Other trademarks owned by Lambert, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Lambert, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Lambert, Douglas
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named VEGAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |