USPTO serial 74521300
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Lamont Whitham
C LAMONT WHITHAM WHITHAM, CURTIS & WHITHAM, PC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 220RESTON, VA 22091UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | third party technical audits of medical equipment and medical facilities including both medical equipment testing and evaluation in terms of operability, performance, and safety, and medical facility inspection and evalution in terms of performance of the components, namely electrical, mechanical, waste disposal, and water, in the physical plant, layout of the physical plant, and safety within the physical plant; and third party technical and performance audit of emissions testing programs, and particularly including IM 240 emissions testing for compliance with state and federal regulations such as the Clean Air Act of 1990; and facility and property third party technical and performance audits of public and private facilities, namely airports, harbors, power plants, refineries and petro-chemical plants, desalination plants, waste processing and hazardous waste handling and disposal facilities; and third party quality control and monitoring of maintenance programs and operations, namely aircraft maintenance programs, vehicles and automobile maintenance programs, military and armored vehicles maintenance programs and operations, transportation equipment maintenance programs and operations, and nuclear technology and radiation protection programs and operations | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 3, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |