Drawing for TAQ

USPTO serial 74521300

TAQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. Lamont Whitham

C LAMONT WHITHAM WHITHAM, CURTIS & WHITHAM, PC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DR STE 220RESTON, VA 22091UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042third party technical audits of medical equipment and medical facilities including both medical equipment testing and evaluation in terms of operability, performance, and safety, and medical facility inspection and evalution in terms of performance of the components, namely electrical, mechanical, waste disposal, and water, in the physical plant, layout of the physical plant, and safety within the physical plant; and third party technical and performance audit of emissions testing programs, and particularly including IM 240 emissions testing for compliance with state and federal regulations such as the Clean Air Act of 1990; and facility and property third party technical and performance audits of public and private facilities, namely airports, harbors, power plants, refineries and petro-chemical plants, desalination plants, waste processing and hazardous waste handling and disposal facilities; and third party quality control and monitoring of maintenance programs and operations, namely aircraft maintenance programs, vehicles and automobile maintenance programs, military and armored vehicles maintenance programs and operations, transportation equipment maintenance programs and operations, and nuclear technology and radiation protection programs and operationsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 27, 1997REINREINSTATED
Aug 28, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 27, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 3, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 4, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 4, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance