USPTO serial 74530956
GC ELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GC ELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. DeRosa
BARTH X DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | housemark for the distribution and retail sale of electronic switches for electrical components; electronic hand tools, namely wire cutters, wire strippers, screwdrivers, scissors, soldering irons and solder; computer accessories, namely computer cables, gender changers, adapters, modems, switch boxes, voltage surge suppressors and power traps; power strips; electrical wire for electronic components; electrical plugs, electrical jacks and electrical connectors for electronic components; computer enhancements, namely cables, printer cable, computer switch boxes, disk filing boxes, cable adapters and port protectors; computer connectors; telephone wall plates; video wall plates; audio wall plates; electrical wall plates; telephone accessories and parts, namely telephone extension cords, hand sets, cords, electrical station wire, adapters and couplers; telephone batteries; telephone antennas; indoor and outdoor television antennas and parts therefor; video components, namely game protectors, coax surge suppressors; video selectors, RF modulators; solid-state VHF/FM signal amplifiers, band separators, video cables, splitters and couplers; video adapters, transformers, video switches, wall plates, audion speakers; audio speaker selectors, infrared processors and controllers; volume controls, wall plates for speakers; stereo headphones, audio plugs, jacks, adapters, couplers; tapehead cleaners, namely head cleaning tapes for audio and video recorders; home satellite system accessories, namely satellite antennas, coax cable tools, namely compression strippers, crimping tools and cutters, cables and connectors; grounding rods, grounding blocks, signal splitters, signal amplifiers, brackets, wire, plugs, jacks and connectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |