Drawing for HOME COMPUTER WAREHOUSE

USPTO serial 74541573

HOME COMPUTER WAREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOME COMPUTER WAREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. deBrauwere

ROBERT J DEBRAUWERE JACOBS & CONKLIN445 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042mail-order and telephone-order services in the field of computer hardware, software, peripherals, accessories, supplies, forms, books and instructional materialsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 4, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1995IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Feb 9, 1995AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 6, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Dec 8, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance