USPTO serial 74548855
THE SECURITY CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SECURITY CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barth X. deRosa
BARTH X DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | alarm and security systems comprising electronic terminals, sensors, telephone or cable modem and video cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely trousers, sweatshirts, T-shirts and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation and repair services, namely the installation and repair of video, alarm and security systems for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | security services, namely programming and monitoring of alarm, video and security systems in homes, buildings and structures for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Recurring Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Recurring Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE SECURITY CHANNEL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |