CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HEAVE-HO 2 IN A ROW

USPTO serial 74549882

HEAVE-HO 2 IN A ROW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHAW, THOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEAVE-HO 2 IN A ROW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew V. Galway

ANDREW V GALWAY LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER, PC41 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing for men, women and children, namely gloves, mittens, shirts, T-shirts, sweat shirts, jogging suits, pants, cloth bibs skirts, blouses, dresses, suspenders, sweaters, jackets, coats, rain coats, snow suits ties, robes, hats, belts, scarves, sleepwear, boots, shoes, sneakers, sandals, slippers and booties, swimwear, socks, underwear, lingerie, hosiery, leotards and sunvisorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 28, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 1996DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1995DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 1995PRRDPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED—
May 31, 1995PRRRPETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 1995PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Mar 15, 1995PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 2, 1995PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Feb 2, 1995PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance