USPTO serial 74553514
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
TUCKER, FLYER & LEWIS, PC NORM D ST LANDAU1615 L ST NWSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software program offered to retailers to assist in managing the mix of store branded products sold within food stores | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |