USPTO serial 74556059
VERTIFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHULMAN, LORI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERTIFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Neff
CHARLES E NEFF COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC1001 FANNNIN STHOUSTON, TX 77001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | vertical blind hardware system, made primarily of metal, comprised of rods, mounting brackets, screws, bolts, tracks, spacer links, spring pins, cord pulleys, and sprockets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |