USPTO serial 74556313
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | vacuum systems comprising vacuum cleaners and parts and accessories therefor, and electric door chimes for residential and commerical buildings | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1994 |
| 011 | home ventilation products, namely bathroom ventilators, kitchen ventilators, kitchen range hoods, and ventilator combinations comprising vent and light features, and ventilator combinations comprising heat, vent and light features; whole house fans and roof ventilators, namely power attic space ventilators and ceiling fans comprising a light fixture, and electric heat products, namely baseboard heaters and accessories therefor, counter flow wall heaters, forced air heaters, radiant heaters, electric wall heaters, and combination heaters comprising heat, vent and light features and accessories therefor | ABANDONED | Jul 15, 1994 |
| 020 | built-in ironing centers comprising ironing board and ironing board covers, and parts and accessories therefor | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 1995 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |