USPTO serial 74556412
VTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen S. Frank
KAREN S FRANK PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO225 BUSH STP O BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | voice video and data wireline services | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |