USPTO serial 74556553
SF SEENERGY FOODS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SF SEENERGY FOODS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | vegetable based meat substitutes, prepared vegetarian meals and entrees consisting primarily of processed vegetables, vegetarian burger patties, soups, soup mixes, edible oils, yogurt, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables; lentils, dried beans, namely black beans, green beans, yellow beans and fava beans, jellies, jams, pickles, processed nuts, processed edible seeds, fried fava beans; seafood products, namely processed oysters, clams, mussels, scallops, salmon; potato wedges, home fries, hash brown patties, processed potatoes, processed baby roast potatoes, potato puffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | pasta, pasta sauces, rice, processed grains, namely wheat, rye, barley and cous-cous, prepared meals and entrees consisting primarily of pasta, vegetarian burger sandwiches, pizza, chocolates, ice cream, custards, puddings, processed or breakfast cereals, salad dressings; sauces, seasonings, gravies, yeast, mustard, pepper, vinegar, chocolate syrup, corn syrup, flavoring syrup, maple syrup, pancake syrup, table syrup and topping syrup, processed herbs, spices; biscuits, cakes, pastries, breads, buns, rolls, and cookies; corn chips, teas, coffees, and herbal food beverage mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | unprocessed grains and cereals; fresh fruits and vegetables; raw beans; live oysters | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | manufacture of general product lines in the field of food products and beverages to the order and specification of others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seenergy Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Seenergy Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SF SEENERGY FOODS INC.
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |