USPTO serial 74556638
NATURALLY NUTRITIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURALLY NUTRITIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Woodbridge, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Vegetable based meat substitutes, prepared vegetarian meals and entrees consisting primarily of processed vegetables; vegetarian burger patties, soups, soup mixes, edible oils, yogurt, frozen and canned fruits and vegetables; lentils, dried beans namely, black beans, green beans, yellow beans and fava beans; jellies, jams, pickles, processed nuts, processed edible seeds, fried fava beans; seafood products, namely, processed oysters, clams, mussels, scallops, salmon; potato wedges, home fries, hash brown patties, processed potatoes, processed baby roast potatoes, potato puffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pasta, pasta sauces, rice, processed grains namely, wheat, rye, barley and cous-cous, prepared meals and entrees consisting primarily of pasta; vegetarian burger sandwiches, pizza, chocolates, ice cream, custards, puddings, processed or breakfast cereals, salad dressings; sauces, seasonings, gravies, yeast, mustard, pepper, vinegar; chocolate, corn, flavoring, maple, pancake, table and topping syrup; processed herbs, spices; biscuits, cakes, pastries, breads, buns, rolls, and cookies; corn chips, teas, coffees, and herbal food beverage mixes; beverage concentrates to add to liquids to make teas; beverage mix to add to liquids to make teas | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed grains and cereals; fresh fruits and vegetables; raw beans; live oysters | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Beverage concentrates to add to liquids to make juices; beverage mix to add to liquids to make juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seenergy Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Seenergy Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NATURALLY NUTRITIOUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |