USPTO serial 74557654
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
NIAGARA FALLS, ONTARIO, CANADA, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
MARY PAT A WEYBACK DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services in the field of retailing and wholesaling of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, market analysis and/or market research and/or cooperative advertising and marketing in the wine industry, and business research in connection with the wine industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |