USPTO serial 74557741
VINCOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VINCOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, fruit juices, fruit drinks and sparkling waters | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | full line of alcoholic beverages, excluding beer | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business consultation services in the field of retailing and wholesaling of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, market analysis and/or market research and/or cooperative advertising and marketing in the wine industry, and business research in connection with the wine industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting classes and workshops in the field of the wine industry, specific wine products, and marketing wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vincor International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Vincor International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VINCOR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |