Drawing for PARTNERING FOR EXCELLENCE

USPTO serial 74557912

PARTNERING FOR EXCELLENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PORTER, KATHLEEN C.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARTNERING FOR EXCELLENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN R. GARBER

TRADEMARK UNIT HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYCORPORATE LAW DEPTHARTFORD PLZHARTFORD, CT 06115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036insurance underwriting in the fields of accident, medical and healthcareABANDONEDOct 24, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 7, 1997PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 21, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 25, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 1995AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 19, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Mar 10, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance