Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 74559903?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/74559903. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns MICROLASER DISCECTOMY?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 74559903, the listed owner(s) include: Burres, Kenneth P..

What is USPTO serial number 74559903?

Serial number 74559903 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark MICROLASER DISCECTOMY. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of MICROLASER DISCECTOMY?

MICROLASER DISCECTOMY (74559903) currently shows USPTO status code 608 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover MICROLASER DISCECTOMY?

The public record lists International Classes: 010. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: MICROLASER DISCECTOMY Serial# 74559903 | status 608; last event PR.D | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROLASER DISCECTOMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Burres, Kenneth P.
Montclair, CA
Other trademarks owned by Burres, Kenneth P.

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
010	micro laser discectomy - the surgical technique using surgical microscope, neuro endoscope and surgical laser to remove bulging or herniated spinal discs	ABANDONED	May 15, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 30, 1998	PR.D	PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED	—
Aug 31, 1998	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Dec 9, 1997	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 1997	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Mar 31, 1997	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 6, 1997	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 1996	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 13, 1996	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1996	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 25, 1996	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 23, 1996	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 1996	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Nov 13, 1995	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Sep 29, 1995	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 1995	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1995	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

MICROLASER DISCECTOMY