Drawing for UNINET

USPTO serial 74559919

UNINET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WEBER, BRIAN W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNINET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James Reisman

JAMES REISMAN GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035dissemination of advertising by various means, namely, by computer, by facsimile, by mail and by interactive television; preparing and placing advertisements for others; and providing the services of storage of general information for others by computers; providing the services of retrieval of general information for others by computer, by facsimile, by telephone, by mail and by interactive televisionACTIVE
036financial services, namely, debit and credit card services, including credit/debit account transfers, debit/credit card issuances, purchase order fulfillment, discount and/or discount savings plans and establishing consumer credit linesACTIVE
038electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; transmission of messages and data by various means, namely, by computer, by facsimile, by telephone and by interactive television; and electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephoneACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Feb 4, 1999OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Oct 3, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 3, 1997OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Mar 18, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 2, 1996OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Nov 16, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 15, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 13, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 15, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 8, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 1, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 28, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance