USPTO serial 74559962
MUCH MORE THAN A WHITENING TOOTHPASTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUCH MORE THAN A WHITENING TOOTHPASTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence G. Townsend
LAWRENCE G TOWNSEND OWEN, WICKERSHAM AND ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | oral care products, namely toothpastes, bleaching gels, brushing gels, and denture cleaners | ABANDONED | Jul 14, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |