USPTO serial 74560128
KITTY SELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1974401Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 14, 1996
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KITTY SELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MEADVILLE,, PA
Meadville, PA
Meadville, PA
MEADVILLE, PA
MEADVILLE, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joy E. Taylor
Joy E. Taylor Knox McLaughlin Gornall & Sennett, P.C.120 West Tenth StreetErie, PA 16501UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | cat food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AINSWORTH PET NUTRITION, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DAD'S PRODUCTS CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAD'S PRODUCTS CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DAD'S PET CARE
- Other trademarks owned by AINSWORTH PET NUTRITION, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named KITTY SELECT
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 18, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |