USPTO serial 74560498
KISSING DOLPHINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KISSING DOLPHINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hyogo-ku, Kobe, JP
Hyogo-ku, Kobe, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER J CREEDON
PETER J CREEDON WENDEROTH LIND & PONACKSOUTHERN BLDG805 15TH ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | alcoholic beverages, namely, sake, liqueurs, and spirits distilled from fruit, barley, corn and rice | ABANDONED | Mar 28, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |