Drawing for LET'S TALK WIRELESS

USPTO serial 74561170

LET'S TALK WIRELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COHEN, JEFFREY R.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LET'S TALK WIRELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD S. ROSS

RICHARD S ROSS ATRIUM CTR4801 S UNIVERSITY DR STE 307FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33328UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009communications apparatus, namely portable telephones, batteries, telephone and beeper cases, trickle chargers, car cords/battery savers, antennas, cradles/pedestals/brackets, personal digital assistants, beepers/pagers, beeper chains, auto alarms, radar detectors, cordless telephones, long-range cordless telephones, non-cordless single-line telephones, novelty telephones, fax machines, telephone accessories, fax accessories, and home appliance batteriesABANDONED
038communications services, namely wireless telephone servicesABANDONED
042retail and wholesale provision and sales thereofABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 21, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Jan 14, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 11, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 1, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 17, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 4, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance