USPTO serial 74561254
NEOCLASSIC STONE AGE CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEOCLASSIC STONE AGE CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LES AMUSEMENTS STONE LTEE/STONE ENTERTAINMENT LTD
Chomedey, Laval, Province of Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES AMUSEMENTS STONE LTEE/STONE ENTERTAINMENT LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin L. MacGregor
MARTIN L MACGREGOR MCGREGOR & ASSOCIATES26415V OAK RIDGE DRSPRING, TX 77380-1964UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant and bar services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |