USPTO serial 74562045
ABSOLUTE FRUIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ABSOLUTE FRUIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO KARL F ROSS, PCBOX 9005676 RIVERDALE AVERIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chewing gum, fruit-flavored chewing gum and wine-flavored chewing gum | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |