Drawing for Serial No. 74562061

USPTO serial 74562061

Serial No. 74562061

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEETZOW, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74562061?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlana S. Cohen

ARLANA S COHEN LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY BEGLER & COHEN708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041rental of audio and video cassettes, computer software and hardwareABANDONEDMar 1, 1986
042retail store services in the field of audio and video software and hardware, games, video cassettes, music cassettes and compact discs, food stuffs, and related home entertainment products and equipmentABANDONEDMar 1, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 1998ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 19, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 19, 1997EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 4, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jan 9, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 7, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jul 23, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 27, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance