USPTO serial 74562061
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlana S. Cohen
ARLANA S COHEN LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY BEGLER & COHEN708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | rental of audio and video cassettes, computer software and hardware | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1986 |
| 042 | retail store services in the field of audio and video software and hardware, games, video cassettes, music cassettes and compact discs, food stuffs, and related home entertainment products and equipment | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |