USPTO serial 74562153
ECOSMARTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOSMARTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | products for water purification, namely electronic oxidation and/or ionization apparatus for water purification for domestic, recreational, agricultural and industrial use | ABANDONED | Jul 11, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |