USPTO serial 74562841
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory Jones
NEIL GREENSTEIN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER &NEUSTADT PC224 AIRPORT PKWY STE 300SAN JOSE, CA 95110| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software programs that use, employ, or include voice speech recognition capabilities | ABANDONED | May 6, 1995 |
| 016 | pamphlets and instruction manuals for computer software programs that use, employ, or include voice speech recognition capabilities | ABANDONED | Nov 14, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |