USPTO serial 74563540
THE RECYCLABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE RECYCLABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Forest Hills, NY
Forest Hills, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Begler
JAY H BEGLER LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER, PC708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | motion picture and television films comprised of live action and/or animated cartoons; prerecorded goods, namely records featuring music and/or stories relating to children's entertainment and children's education; pre-recorded audio and audio video tapes, cassettes and discs pertaining to children's entertainment and education; audio tape and video tape playback and recording devices; radios | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |