USPTO serial 74563813
RIDUCTIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, LAURA E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RIDUCTIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nottingham, NG2 3AA, GB
Nottingham, NG2 3AA, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
DONALD D JEFFERY ESQ FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST N WP O BOX 25696, STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations and substances used to treat obesity and associated clinical disorders, in particular diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hyperinsulinaemia and heart disease; foods for infants; enteral feeding preparations for invalids; foods for invalids on medically restricted diets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |