USPTO serial 74563817
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul Fields
PAUL FIELDS DARBY & DARBY, PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | information services, namely providing users with access to information, commentaries and summaries on available online databases in the field of computers and online services; product databases and job databases in the field of computers and online services; computer services, namely providing users with access to online search and retrieval of databases and shareware in the field of computers and online services | ABANDONED | Nov 14, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |