USPTO serial 74564215
SERADYN CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERADYN CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KELLY C SCOTT
KELLY C SCOTT SYBRON INTERNATIONAL CORP411 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 2400MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | clinical diagnostic instruments used in the analysis or detection of analytes in human or animal blood, bodily fluids, or by-products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |