USPTO serial 74564345
ALOE-CELTZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2020000Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 1996
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALOE-CELTZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | effervescent tablet to aid digestion | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |