USPTO serial 74564399
EXPERT SCHEDULING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPERT SCHEDULING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE C. RONDEAU
GEORGE C RONDEAU SEED AND BERRY6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers for use in telecommunications, computer software for use in telecommunications by call centers to allocate agents to activites, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith, computers and computer software, both for use in arranging the flow of work among operators of a telephone system and among users of a computer network, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Systems International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Systems International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EXPERT SCHEDULING
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |