USPTO serial 74564544
#800
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEETZOW, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with #800?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER STEIMEL JR
WALTER STEIMEL JR LOEB & LOEB LLP901 New York Ave NWSuite 300 EastWashington, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telephone telecommunications access, routing, delivery and completion services for mobile, cellular and other wireless, two-way communications services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |