USPTO serial 74567937
AIRWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WONG, CONRAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
78180 Montigny-LE-BRETONNEUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Lewis
JOSEPH D LEWIS CLEARY & KOMEN600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE SE STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | air conditioning units, electric heaters, air filtering units, and dehumidifiers, all for commercial, industrial, or domestic use, and parts and fittings therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |