USPTO serial 74568522
MARATHON HEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TUCCILLO, SUSANA M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MARATHON HEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, men's, women's and children's shirts, pants shorts, jeans, and undergarments, tank tops, leggings, pajamas, wet suits, suspenders, ties, scarves, infant cloth diapers, socks, skirts, hats, boots, slippers, shoes, headbands, overcoats, jackets, warm-up suits, jogging suits, sweatshirts, T-shirts and wristbands | ACTIVE | Jul 19, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |