USPTO serial 74572660
TALOSORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALOSORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in sugar manufacturing and processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | dispensing machines for use in sugar processing; computer-controlled dispensing machines for use in sugar processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | computer hardware; computer programs, stored on tapes or discs, used in the fields of processing and manufacturing of sugar; computerized production-control and monitoring units for use in the manufacture and processing of sugar | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computerized data base management services for sugar manufacturers and processors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | technical consultation and design services for others in the field of sugar processing and manufacturing; computer programming for others in the field of sugar processing and manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TATE & LYLE INDUSTRIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TATE & LYLE INDUSTRIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TALOSORB
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |