USPTO serial 74574981
ENVIROSEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIROSEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert T. Johnson, Jr.
ROBERT T JOHNSON JR BELL, BOYD & LLOYEP O BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | seals, bushings, grommets, diaphragms, spacers, insulators, gaskets, rings, balls, boots, plugs, washers, electrical connectors, caps, and seats, all made of rubber, used to seal against potable water and marketed primarily to the residential OEM market and after market in the drinking water industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Western Consolidated Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Western Consolidated Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named ENVIROSEAL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |