USPTO serial 74575064
T & E SOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with T & E SOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer peripheral devices, namely, printers, keyboards, mouse, monitors, and disc drives; computer operating system software for use in running computer game apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | simulation system comprised of a computer, computer monitor, projection screen, projector, control box, sensor, and speaker, all for playing golf; electronic game apparatus, namely, joysticks, control pads, and control deck for games adapted for use with television monitors and displays using liquid crystal panels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha T & E Soft (T & E Soft Inc.)
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha T & E Soft (T & E Soft Inc.)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named T & E SOFT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |