Drawing for SYSTEMS INTEGRATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

USPTO serial 74575862

SYSTEMS INTEGRATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LYKOS, ANGELA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYSTEMS INTEGRATION SOLUTIONS, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consulting services in the field of information technology, computer systems and software developmentABANDONEDApr 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 12, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 22, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 22, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Nov 20, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Nov 20, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 27, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 1, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 1, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 1, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 2, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance