USPTO serial 74576631
LIBERTY BELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS,ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIBERTY BELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra Edelman
SANDRA EDELMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | transmission of cable and broadcast television programming, and pay-for-view and subscription broadcasting services, namely, interactive text and video services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |