USPTO serial 74577116
HIGHLANDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGHLANDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paris, FR
Paris, FR
Neuilly-Sur-Seine, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing and accessories, namely, Halloween costumes, hats, shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweatsuits, underwear, hosiery, pajamas, headwear, gloves, belts, and excluding footwear, all relating to and distributed in connection with the motion picture services and television services with the same name | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |